|
Day 3 - Tuesday, September 5th (Performance) For the first time I tried to work with Windows Vista RC1 and so far my experience is rather good. I wrote an article for a magazine with Word 2003 which means I had to use Office, PhotoImpact, Photoshop and the web extensively. No problems at all! Everything went very smooth and it is fun working with the new AERO UI. But my normal workflow did not improve with Windows Vista - I did not complete my work any faster or easier with Microsofts new operating system. In fact, Vista ended up getting in my way for example while accessing the network (renamed folders in RC1 did not refresh for example) or while struggling with the inconsistent UI that Paul Thurrott already mentions here. If I would use this machine MAINLY as my business laptop I would (as a customer) not buy Windows Vista. At least, not yet. Ive been to PDC, Mix06 and TechEd 2006 conferences and I have seen a lot of VERY interesting Vista-only applications - so I guess whenever these are finished I would consider an upgrade from Windows XP.
Another issue I noticed: Compared to Windows XP some applications that are accessing the hard disk vastly still need some performance optimization. For example: It takes NetObjects Fusion 9 in Windows Vista almost 8-10 seconds when opening a webpage. With Windows XP it only takes between 2-4 seconds. Hard disk operations are still somewhat slow. Especially when accessing media files (videos, pictures) with Vista Media Center or the Windows Explorer it takes the system significantly longer to display these files. But since weve already seen A LOT improvements in this area with past builds I believe Microsoft should be able to resolve this issue with the final version (RTM).
However, whenever Vista or 3rd party software makes heavy use of Memory or the CPU I immediatelly noticed the new kernel architecture: All memory/arithmetic operations (e.g. converting a movie file, encryption, compressing) finished approx. 25% faster than they did in Windows XP. I should also note that two games I installed today (Far Cry and Age of Empires III) loaded up and performed faster, as well. I am also much happier with the multitasking-performance: I always load up multiple instances of IE, Explorer and most of my applications which means that most of the times I use at least 30-50 applications simultaneously. Windows Vista is capable of handling all this workload significantly better than its predecessor did or still does.
I am left with mixed feelings here on day 3. The performance is sometimes much better and sometimes much worse than before (with XP) - depends on the kind of operation youre performing. When it comes to strictly using my business applications I did not notice a difference at all. Its not easier or (to use marketing slang) sleeker, more clear or anything.
|